Whether you have diabetes or whether you are concerned about the possibility of being diagnosed with diabetes in the future you should take a minute to review your life cover. If you need more than its probably a good idea to act sooner rather than later.
Here's why.
Currently Diabetic? - Once you have started your life cover, the terms (including the premium amounts) are generally guaranteed for the rest of the policy providing that continue to pay your premiums, irrespective of future changes in your health. Delaying taking out cover will generally end up costing you more money when you take out cover at a later date because you will be older. It may also cost you more because of the progress of your diabetes, especially if you develop more complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy or kidney issues. So again arranging your cover now protects you from the effects that future changes are likely to have if you delay. Worse still some future health developments could mean that it becomes impossible to be able to obtain life insurance. One highly relevant example of this would be the future development of any heart issues which is a significant additional risk factor for diabetics. Unfortunately no mainstream insurance companies will offer life cover to any diabetic, type 1 or type 2, who also then goes on to develop a condition such as angina or who has a heart attack. However the life insurance policy terms for those diabetics who arranged their life cover before they developed any heart conditions are still guaranteed, which also means that if death accours as a result of a heart attack you are still covered.
Not Currently Diabetic But Worried About Being Diagnosed With Diabetes In The Future?
You would also be well advised to review your life cover now rather than later. Now you may still be able to obatin life cover at lower premium rates and in the absence of any significant existing health factors there is a good chance that you may be able to so at 'normal' premium rates, which are the cheapest premium rates. Again if you take out the cover now these premium rates are generally guaranateed. If you delay sorting out your cover until you are diagnosed with diabetes, expect to pay higher premiums and in some cases much higher premium rates. Also if you delay until you are diagnosed you should expect to experience difficulty in being able to arrange some other valuable benefits, for example critical illness cover. This could mean for example if the purpose of the life insurance is pay off a mortgage that the option to include insurance to pay off the mortgage if you have a heart attack is simply no longer available to you even though the risk of it happening has increased.
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
Thursday, 3 November 2011
Sainsbury's Shock Report - Is Fear To Blame?
I have been trying to get my ahead around some statistics that I came across yesterday.
Sainsbury's commissioned the research looking at how many people in the UK had mortgages with no life cover in place to repay the outstanding balance. The results show some surprisingly big numbers, much bigger than most would perhaps guess.
Firstly the total figure of mortgages without life cover is given at £245,000,000,000 - thats a quarter of a trillion. But 'billions' and 'trillions' are everyday newspeak terms now, over used by both politicians and news reporters these words have become a sort of TV litter which we therefore tend to ignore as part of the familiar landscape.
Dig a bit deeper into the Sainsbury report figures though and we start to find more meaningful statistics.
The number of people with no life insurance to cover their mortgages? Just under 7 Million, or to put in a more meaningful way that equals just over 4 in every 10 mortgages. The report goes on to break down this figure between different age bands, as follows
Sainsbury's commissioned the research looking at how many people in the UK had mortgages with no life cover in place to repay the outstanding balance. The results show some surprisingly big numbers, much bigger than most would perhaps guess.
Firstly the total figure of mortgages without life cover is given at £245,000,000,000 - thats a quarter of a trillion. But 'billions' and 'trillions' are everyday newspeak terms now, over used by both politicians and news reporters these words have become a sort of TV litter which we therefore tend to ignore as part of the familiar landscape.
Dig a bit deeper into the Sainsbury report figures though and we start to find more meaningful statistics.
The number of people with no life insurance to cover their mortgages? Just under 7 Million, or to put in a more meaningful way that equals just over 4 in every 10 mortgages. The report goes on to break down this figure between different age bands, as follows
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
Business Owners - A Key Catastrophe To Avoid
A few years ago a bad thing happened.
We received a telephone call from a potential new client asking to cancel our appointment with him and his business partner because his business partner had died suddenly the day before. The purpose of the meeting had been to arrange some life cover for each of the two business partners so that if either of them died the other would be provided with enough money to buy out the other's shares in the business.
However shocking the sudden loss of a close friend and business partner was, the troubles didn't end there.
The family of the dead partner had never had any involvement in the day to day running of the business but of course they had depended upon the business for their income. What were they going to do now?
The two business owners had been skilled professional engineers and been responsible between them for most of the business reveue. With only one fee earner remaining the business faced significantly lower revenue meaning that the business could not continue to fund at the same level both sets of income - something would have to give.
How did this story end?
The remaining shareholder who was in his late 50's and had been hoping to retire in a few years was forced to remortgage his own home to provide the capital necessary to buy out his ex business partner's shares - putting up his own home as security was the only way he could raise the necessary required funds. Big change for him then and for his own family.
Here's a thought - what if I said this man was lucky! How could that be? Surely he was unlucky?
Well obviously he was unlucky because he hadn't put a robust disaster recovery plan into place in time and it ended up personally costing a him a fortune in added debt, delaying his retirement by years and putting himself, his family and his home at risk. The cost of the insurance premiums necessary to prevent this personal calamity would have been a fraction of what he ended up having to pay.
And the lucky bit? Well this all happened a few years ago at a time when he was able to raise sufficient extra equity from his property to finance the share purchase.
It could have been much worse - it could have happened now.
Because as we all know - right now persuading banks to lend money is a completely different proposition compared to a few years ago and likely to be even more difficult when the bank learns that the business has just lost a key person who was a responsible for a earning a significant proportion of business revenue. Put bluntly for a great many business owners the answer right now is going to be no.
And then what? A forced sale to a third party perhaps?
If you a have any concerns about protecting your business and your assets why not contact us at Moneysworth 0845 430 5200. We can help you take back control and make a plan to insure against the huge costs and risks of this future potential catastrophe for your own business.
We received a telephone call from a potential new client asking to cancel our appointment with him and his business partner because his business partner had died suddenly the day before. The purpose of the meeting had been to arrange some life cover for each of the two business partners so that if either of them died the other would be provided with enough money to buy out the other's shares in the business.
However shocking the sudden loss of a close friend and business partner was, the troubles didn't end there.
The family of the dead partner had never had any involvement in the day to day running of the business but of course they had depended upon the business for their income. What were they going to do now?
The two business owners had been skilled professional engineers and been responsible between them for most of the business reveue. With only one fee earner remaining the business faced significantly lower revenue meaning that the business could not continue to fund at the same level both sets of income - something would have to give.
How did this story end?
The remaining shareholder who was in his late 50's and had been hoping to retire in a few years was forced to remortgage his own home to provide the capital necessary to buy out his ex business partner's shares - putting up his own home as security was the only way he could raise the necessary required funds. Big change for him then and for his own family.
Here's a thought - what if I said this man was lucky! How could that be? Surely he was unlucky?
Well obviously he was unlucky because he hadn't put a robust disaster recovery plan into place in time and it ended up personally costing a him a fortune in added debt, delaying his retirement by years and putting himself, his family and his home at risk. The cost of the insurance premiums necessary to prevent this personal calamity would have been a fraction of what he ended up having to pay.
And the lucky bit? Well this all happened a few years ago at a time when he was able to raise sufficient extra equity from his property to finance the share purchase.
It could have been much worse - it could have happened now.
Because as we all know - right now persuading banks to lend money is a completely different proposition compared to a few years ago and likely to be even more difficult when the bank learns that the business has just lost a key person who was a responsible for a earning a significant proportion of business revenue. Put bluntly for a great many business owners the answer right now is going to be no.
And then what? A forced sale to a third party perhaps?
If you a have any concerns about protecting your business and your assets why not contact us at Moneysworth 0845 430 5200. We can help you take back control and make a plan to insure against the huge costs and risks of this future potential catastrophe for your own business.
Saturday, 22 October 2011
Retirement Plan Limits for 2012
by Richard F. O'Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
The Internal Revenue Service is boosting the maximum contribution that workers can make to their 401(k), 403(b) and most 457 retirement plans without paying upfront taxes. The limit will rise by $500 to $17,000 for 2012. Workers over 50 can add another $5,500 to that. Individuals may still contribute $5,000 to traditional IRAs or Roth IRAs, or $6,000 if older than 50.
The deduction for taxpayers making contributions to a traditional IRA is phased out for singles and heads of household who are covered by a workplace retirement plan and have modified adjusted gross incomes (AGI) between $58,000 and $68,000, up from $56,000 and $66,000 in 2011. For married couples filing jointly, in which the spouse who makes the IRA contribution is covered by a workplace retirement plan, the income phase-out range is $92,000 to $112,000, up from $90,000 to $110,000. For an IRA contributor who is not covered by a workplace retirement plan and is married to someone who is covered, the deduction is phased out if the couple’s income is between $173,000 and $183,000, up from $169,000 and $179,000.
The AGI phase-out range for taxpayers making contributions to a Roth IRA is $173,000 to $183,000 for married couples filing jointly, up from $169,000 to $179,000 in 2011. For singles and heads of household, the income phase-out range is $110,000 to $125,000, up from $107,000 to $122,000. For a married individual filing a separate return who is covered by a retirement plan at work, the phase-out range remains $0 to $10,000.
The AGI limit for the saver’s credit (also known as the retirement savings contributions credit) for low-and moderate-income workers is $57,500 for married couples filing jointly, up from $56,500 in 2011; $43,125 for heads of household, up from $42,375; and $28,750 for married individuals filing separately and for singles, up from $28,250.
The Internal Revenue Service is boosting the maximum contribution that workers can make to their 401(k), 403(b) and most 457 retirement plans without paying upfront taxes. The limit will rise by $500 to $17,000 for 2012. Workers over 50 can add another $5,500 to that. Individuals may still contribute $5,000 to traditional IRAs or Roth IRAs, or $6,000 if older than 50.
The deduction for taxpayers making contributions to a traditional IRA is phased out for singles and heads of household who are covered by a workplace retirement plan and have modified adjusted gross incomes (AGI) between $58,000 and $68,000, up from $56,000 and $66,000 in 2011. For married couples filing jointly, in which the spouse who makes the IRA contribution is covered by a workplace retirement plan, the income phase-out range is $92,000 to $112,000, up from $90,000 to $110,000. For an IRA contributor who is not covered by a workplace retirement plan and is married to someone who is covered, the deduction is phased out if the couple’s income is between $173,000 and $183,000, up from $169,000 and $179,000.
The AGI phase-out range for taxpayers making contributions to a Roth IRA is $173,000 to $183,000 for married couples filing jointly, up from $169,000 to $179,000 in 2011. For singles and heads of household, the income phase-out range is $110,000 to $125,000, up from $107,000 to $122,000. For a married individual filing a separate return who is covered by a retirement plan at work, the phase-out range remains $0 to $10,000.
The AGI limit for the saver’s credit (also known as the retirement savings contributions credit) for low-and moderate-income workers is $57,500 for married couples filing jointly, up from $56,500 in 2011; $43,125 for heads of household, up from $42,375; and $28,750 for married individuals filing separately and for singles, up from $28,250.
Should I Replace My Life Insurance or Annuity Policy?
by Richard F. O'Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
Life insurance and annuity contracts are intended to be medium- to long-term agreements. Term life insurance policies often have 20-year durations, and many annuity contracts have 8-year surrender periods. But in some cases, it makes sense to cancel or replace a contract with a new one. When should you cancel or replace your life insurance or annuity policy?
You may consider making the change if:
- The term is expiring on your old policy and the rate is sky-rocketing;
- Your health has improved from the time when you originally applied for your policy, for example, you may have quit smoking, lost a lot of weight, controlled diabetes, or passed five years after cancer. Many companies will allow you to take a new medical and keep the existing policy with a new lower rate;
- The rate on a permanent policy may have become unaffordable and it is at risk of lapse. Consider reducing the death benefit (and thus the premium) or using cash values and dividends to pay the premium over the short term;
- Companies change the contract terms on newer policies for Universal Life from time to time. Consider switching to a different UL policy if the crediting interest rate or guaranteed minimum are better or if the monthly costs of insurance are lower. Keep in mind that as you get older your underlying costs get higher;
- A 1035 exchange allows you to transfer the cash values of a life insurance policy or annuity contract directly into a new contract without exposing the cash to taxation. Again, make sure that the terms of the new contract are more favorable. With an annuity, you should check the guaranteed minimum interest rate, since on older contracts it may be much higher.
New York requires a lengthy process to replace a life insurance or annuity contract. This is designed to ensure that both you and your agent “do the math” to make sure the new policy costs are fully disclosed, that the new policy is suitable for your needs and you both quantify the costs and benefits before changing plans.
When considering replacing or cancelling your life insurance policy, keep in mind that by starting a new policy, you have a new two-year “contestability” period where there might be limits on the payout of the death benefit. Never cancel a policy until the new policy is in force, even if it means paying premiums for both policies for one month.
Life insurance and annuity contracts are intended to be medium- to long-term agreements. Term life insurance policies often have 20-year durations, and many annuity contracts have 8-year surrender periods. But in some cases, it makes sense to cancel or replace a contract with a new one. When should you cancel or replace your life insurance or annuity policy?
You may consider making the change if:
- The term is expiring on your old policy and the rate is sky-rocketing;
- Your health has improved from the time when you originally applied for your policy, for example, you may have quit smoking, lost a lot of weight, controlled diabetes, or passed five years after cancer. Many companies will allow you to take a new medical and keep the existing policy with a new lower rate;
- The rate on a permanent policy may have become unaffordable and it is at risk of lapse. Consider reducing the death benefit (and thus the premium) or using cash values and dividends to pay the premium over the short term;
- Companies change the contract terms on newer policies for Universal Life from time to time. Consider switching to a different UL policy if the crediting interest rate or guaranteed minimum are better or if the monthly costs of insurance are lower. Keep in mind that as you get older your underlying costs get higher;
- A 1035 exchange allows you to transfer the cash values of a life insurance policy or annuity contract directly into a new contract without exposing the cash to taxation. Again, make sure that the terms of the new contract are more favorable. With an annuity, you should check the guaranteed minimum interest rate, since on older contracts it may be much higher.
New York requires a lengthy process to replace a life insurance or annuity contract. This is designed to ensure that both you and your agent “do the math” to make sure the new policy costs are fully disclosed, that the new policy is suitable for your needs and you both quantify the costs and benefits before changing plans.
When considering replacing or cancelling your life insurance policy, keep in mind that by starting a new policy, you have a new two-year “contestability” period where there might be limits on the payout of the death benefit. Never cancel a policy until the new policy is in force, even if it means paying premiums for both policies for one month.
Sunday, 16 October 2011
Book Review: “Buckets of Money: How to Retire in Comfort and Safety,” by Raymond J. Lucia, CFP
Book Review: “Buckets of Money: How to Retire in Comfort and Safety,” by Raymond J. Lucia, CFP (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004)
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
“The Insider’s Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning”
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
We’re taught to save throughout our working years to fund our retirement – diligently socking money into our 401(k)s and paying down our debt. But once we flip the switch and settle into a presumably worry-free retirement, how do we effectively and efficiently spend down our assets in those golden years? Ray Lucia, a Certified Financial Planner with a celebrity’s flair, helps us to answer this tough question with his “buckets of money” planning strategy.
The gist of “Buckets of Money” is that our nest eggs should be separated into three “buckets” of ultra-safe income streams, conservative medium-term assets and aggressive stock funds. Over seven-year cycles, the funds are depleted and shifted into the next immediate bucket to be used for current income. The buckets strategy leaps the key retirement planning hurdle by providing safety, growth, diversification, tax-efficiency and lifetime income. The book identifies which investments are appropriate for which buckets, along with guidelines for the proportions of each.
The book reads like a infomercial, but don’t let that turn you off. The general discussion of asset classes and products (stocks, bonds, annuities, etc.) is valuable for the novice and experienced investor alike. His comprehensive perspective honestly allows him to cover all potential investment classes. Mr. Lucia isn’t trying to sell you on anything other than his planning strategy (and he does that well).
Mr. Lucia’s website contains some notes on changes, but I’d like to see a fully updated edition of the book. For example, the buckets strategy recommends real estate holdings of as much as 20% of a portfolio in the form of real estate investment trusts. Given the 2008 mortgage meltdown, perhaps that should be reconsidered. Mr. Lucia only skims past the important backstop that life, disability and long-term care insurance provide as we switch our retirement portfolio from accumulation mode to distribution mode. Fortunately, the author takes into account the complexities of the tax code since intelligent tax planning can make or break a retirement plan. The book’s numerous statistical examples remain useful today.
The worksheets included in the book are quite easy to use. While the potential to “do it yourself” is there for the experienced investor who has a trusted advisor, I wouldn’t recommend that an individual adjust her portfolio without consulting a professional. I’m not sure if the buckets strategy is an “all or nothing” approach to investing. Any retirement plan can benefit from the non-controversial concepts presented here.
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
“The Insider’s Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning”
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
We’re taught to save throughout our working years to fund our retirement – diligently socking money into our 401(k)s and paying down our debt. But once we flip the switch and settle into a presumably worry-free retirement, how do we effectively and efficiently spend down our assets in those golden years? Ray Lucia, a Certified Financial Planner with a celebrity’s flair, helps us to answer this tough question with his “buckets of money” planning strategy.
The gist of “Buckets of Money” is that our nest eggs should be separated into three “buckets” of ultra-safe income streams, conservative medium-term assets and aggressive stock funds. Over seven-year cycles, the funds are depleted and shifted into the next immediate bucket to be used for current income. The buckets strategy leaps the key retirement planning hurdle by providing safety, growth, diversification, tax-efficiency and lifetime income. The book identifies which investments are appropriate for which buckets, along with guidelines for the proportions of each.
The book reads like a infomercial, but don’t let that turn you off. The general discussion of asset classes and products (stocks, bonds, annuities, etc.) is valuable for the novice and experienced investor alike. His comprehensive perspective honestly allows him to cover all potential investment classes. Mr. Lucia isn’t trying to sell you on anything other than his planning strategy (and he does that well).
Mr. Lucia’s website contains some notes on changes, but I’d like to see a fully updated edition of the book. For example, the buckets strategy recommends real estate holdings of as much as 20% of a portfolio in the form of real estate investment trusts. Given the 2008 mortgage meltdown, perhaps that should be reconsidered. Mr. Lucia only skims past the important backstop that life, disability and long-term care insurance provide as we switch our retirement portfolio from accumulation mode to distribution mode. Fortunately, the author takes into account the complexities of the tax code since intelligent tax planning can make or break a retirement plan. The book’s numerous statistical examples remain useful today.
The worksheets included in the book are quite easy to use. While the potential to “do it yourself” is there for the experienced investor who has a trusted advisor, I wouldn’t recommend that an individual adjust her portfolio without consulting a professional. I’m not sure if the buckets strategy is an “all or nothing” approach to investing. Any retirement plan can benefit from the non-controversial concepts presented here.
Fee-based vs. Commission-based Financial Planners: The Pros and Cons
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
“The Insider’s Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning”
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
Throughout this article, I have referred to “financial planner” in the general sense to indicate advisors who work with life insurance, annuities, disability coverage and retirement planning. A “Certified Financial Planner” is a specific professional designation.
It’s common knowledge that you have to spend money to make money and having a professional financial planner in your court is a smart investment, but should you go with an advisor who charges you a flat fee or one who works on commission?
There are certainly pros and cons to each type and it may boil down to the financial planner you feel most comfortable with, regardless of how they make their living. When looking for any type of professional help, it’s always a good idea to seek out recommendations. Ask friends, family or co-workers what their experiences have been with financial planners and see if they think highly enough of theirs to give a good review. Reputation is everything in this field, so try to avoid inexperienced, poorly reviewed investment advisors.
Fee-based financial planners work by the hour, which may sound simple enough. They charge a set hourly fee or, in some cases, a flat fee for their services. The catch is, most fee-based planners also earn commission based on the financial products they sell. This can cause a conflict between your interests and theirs and your portfolio may end up suffering for it.
There are several different ways that fee-based planners charge:
- A percentage of assets under management
- Flat fees in the form of an annual retainer
- Hourly fees with a cap on the total amount
- Any combination of the above
It should be noted that “fee-based” is not the same thing as “fee-only.” Investment advisors who only charge a fee may be more impartial because they only work for the fees charged to clients, whether that is an hourly fee or an a la carte rate. Generally, fee-only financial planners focus on analyzing portfolios as a whole, so they have to be well versed in all areas. These include college financial aid, real estate, retirement and much more. With no commission to worry about, they might not pressure you into any products or investments. It’s in their best interest to grow your assets, since they may be paid more over time.
Commission-based financial planners are the opposite of fee-only advisors in that they earn money solely on the investments they sell. Most life insurance agents are paid commissions by the insurance company when they place a case. Remember, the insurance company pays the advisor the commission, not the client. When working with a commission-based advisor, you need to be sure that they respect your choices and share with you the available options. If it feels like the advisor is being overly forceful with a certain type of investment, especially one that you are not comfortable with, that’s a sure sign that they are thinking more of themselves than your portfolio.
New York requires life insurance agents to disclose when they are paid by commission. Commission rates on fixed annuities, term life insurance or whole life insurance are generally consistent across all insurance companies. It’s rare to have a company pay much higher than average commissions, unless it’s a product like a variable annuity, indexed annuity or life insurance contract.
Some investors may be best suited to having a good commission-based advisor:
- Investors with small portfolios that require much less management
- Clients who needs a basic review or analysis of their portfolio
- People looking for a specific product such as life insurance
Commission-based advisors may have access to better facilities and other financial professionals such as analysts and traders etc. They may also have the backing of a respected and renowned firm. Most fee-based advisors work independently, although they may have past experience as a commission-based advisor.
Regardless of how your advisor gets paid, remember that they are the financial professional and have the experience, education and drive to see your investments succeed, so take any advice to heart, even if you don’t act on it. If your commission-based advisor pressures you into active trading, because this is one way they receive bigger commissions, remind them that they are working for you, not the other way around. Always clarify how your advisor is being paid, if they don’t come right out and tell you at the outset.
No matter how you pay your financial planner, saving money and increasing your investments should be their top priority. The commission vs. fees debate is a hot topic in the world of financial planning, but it’s always best to work with someone you can personally trust, regardless of how they come by their paycheck.
“The Insider’s Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning”
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
Throughout this article, I have referred to “financial planner” in the general sense to indicate advisors who work with life insurance, annuities, disability coverage and retirement planning. A “Certified Financial Planner” is a specific professional designation.
It’s common knowledge that you have to spend money to make money and having a professional financial planner in your court is a smart investment, but should you go with an advisor who charges you a flat fee or one who works on commission?
There are certainly pros and cons to each type and it may boil down to the financial planner you feel most comfortable with, regardless of how they make their living. When looking for any type of professional help, it’s always a good idea to seek out recommendations. Ask friends, family or co-workers what their experiences have been with financial planners and see if they think highly enough of theirs to give a good review. Reputation is everything in this field, so try to avoid inexperienced, poorly reviewed investment advisors.
Fee-based financial planners work by the hour, which may sound simple enough. They charge a set hourly fee or, in some cases, a flat fee for their services. The catch is, most fee-based planners also earn commission based on the financial products they sell. This can cause a conflict between your interests and theirs and your portfolio may end up suffering for it.
There are several different ways that fee-based planners charge:
- A percentage of assets under management
- Flat fees in the form of an annual retainer
- Hourly fees with a cap on the total amount
- Any combination of the above
It should be noted that “fee-based” is not the same thing as “fee-only.” Investment advisors who only charge a fee may be more impartial because they only work for the fees charged to clients, whether that is an hourly fee or an a la carte rate. Generally, fee-only financial planners focus on analyzing portfolios as a whole, so they have to be well versed in all areas. These include college financial aid, real estate, retirement and much more. With no commission to worry about, they might not pressure you into any products or investments. It’s in their best interest to grow your assets, since they may be paid more over time.
Commission-based financial planners are the opposite of fee-only advisors in that they earn money solely on the investments they sell. Most life insurance agents are paid commissions by the insurance company when they place a case. Remember, the insurance company pays the advisor the commission, not the client. When working with a commission-based advisor, you need to be sure that they respect your choices and share with you the available options. If it feels like the advisor is being overly forceful with a certain type of investment, especially one that you are not comfortable with, that’s a sure sign that they are thinking more of themselves than your portfolio.
New York requires life insurance agents to disclose when they are paid by commission. Commission rates on fixed annuities, term life insurance or whole life insurance are generally consistent across all insurance companies. It’s rare to have a company pay much higher than average commissions, unless it’s a product like a variable annuity, indexed annuity or life insurance contract.
Some investors may be best suited to having a good commission-based advisor:
- Investors with small portfolios that require much less management
- Clients who needs a basic review or analysis of their portfolio
- People looking for a specific product such as life insurance
Commission-based advisors may have access to better facilities and other financial professionals such as analysts and traders etc. They may also have the backing of a respected and renowned firm. Most fee-based advisors work independently, although they may have past experience as a commission-based advisor.
Regardless of how your advisor gets paid, remember that they are the financial professional and have the experience, education and drive to see your investments succeed, so take any advice to heart, even if you don’t act on it. If your commission-based advisor pressures you into active trading, because this is one way they receive bigger commissions, remind them that they are working for you, not the other way around. Always clarify how your advisor is being paid, if they don’t come right out and tell you at the outset.
No matter how you pay your financial planner, saving money and increasing your investments should be their top priority. The commission vs. fees debate is a hot topic in the world of financial planning, but it’s always best to work with someone you can personally trust, regardless of how they come by their paycheck.
Friday, 2 September 2011
Understanding Insurance Company Financial Ratings
Understanding Insurance Company Financial Ratings
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
Triple A, Gone Away
Well, it’s official: The United States Government no longer has a perfect credit score. On August 5, 2011 its credit rating was lowered by Standard & Poor’s to AA+ from AAA. The rating on the debt of the federal government and some specific agencies such as mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was lowered because S&P deemed it more risky due to the ballooning federal debt and the inability of the political process to reform entitlement programs.
In theory the four top rating agencies – Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, A.M. Best and Fitch’s – are the arbiters of the Country’s credit score. Despite all the sound and fury from the politicians in Washington, there are some real-life implications for people on Main Street. The lowering by S&P by one notch effectively brings the country’s FICO score down to something like 775 from 800.
It’s not that dramatic since only one of the top four rating agencies took such a drastic approach (the others said the Government’s problems are long-term and would not immediately affect their ratings). I’d like to note that some smaller agencies had already taken the politically unpalatable step of lowering the country’s rating. Let’s also keep in mind that S&P has been under serious political pressure to “get real” about its rating since it did such a pathetic job of rating all of those toxic mortgage-backed securities (see “The Big Short”).
Given all of the political pressure from Congress regarding the mortgage securities fiasco of the last three years, it’s ironic that they should come to downgrade the U.S. Government’s rating. Expect to see “show trials” (i.e., Congressional hearings) in Washington demonizing the rating agencies. Again, it’s ironic since the U.S. has been less than reliable when accounting for future liabilities such as Social Security and Medicare.
But, again, let’s put politics aside and investigate the “real life” implications of the aforementioned “downgrade:”
Insurance Company Ratings: What Do They Mean?
In tandem with the downgrade of the Government’s credit rating, S&P also lowered the AAA rating of a handful of the most stellar insurance companies. They also put the rest of the insurance industry on a “Negative” outlook (downgraded from “Stable”), mainly because of the heavy exposure they all have to U.S. securities in their reserve portfolios.
Companies downgraded to AA+ (Negative Outlook) from AAA (Stable Outlook):
New York Life
Northwestern Mutual
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association (TIAA-CREF)
Knights of Columbus
United Services Automobile Association (USAA)
Companies rated AA+ with “Stable Outlook” reduced to “Negative Outlook:”
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
Assured Guaranty Corp.
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc.
Does this mean that your life insurance company is about to go bankrupt ? Most likely, not. What it does mean is that S&P has decided that insurance companies that invest heavily in one country’s bonds can not have a higher credit rating than the actual bonds that they hold. So, in lockstep, if the U.S. rating goes down, so must the companies that hold a lot of U.S. debt. Needless to say, the affected insurance companies say they are unfairly being hit due to Washington’s political gridlock and that they still merit AAA ratings.
Going forward, the insurance companies will bolster their overall credit ratings by selling off their lower quality assets and buying higher quality ones. This may effectively improve their balance sheets over the long term and even increase their exposure to U.S. debt instruments. S&P maintained AAA ratings on many municipal bonds, so there still are high-quality assets for the insurance companies to put into their reserves. The reason the top handful of companies actually had the best ratings is that often they are better judges of quality than even the rating agencies.
The lowering of the U.S.’ credit rating, in the immediate term, has not led to a sell-off in U.S. Treasury assets. But indeed, we have seen a “flight to quality” as many investors see the U.S. Treasury Bonds as the “cleanest shirt in a hamper full of dirty shirts.” (I believe I can credit economics guru Nouriel Roubini for this analogy on Bloomberg Radio). In effect, U.S. assets at AA+ are still better quality than many European bonds.
Ultimately, the jury is still on whether interest rates on mortgages and credit cards will spike up. Longer term interest rates will be affected more by the strength or weakness of the overall economy and the amount of stimulus provided by the Federal Reserve and Congressional budget committees.
Why Ratings Still Matter
So why do we even care about ratings attributed to countries or businesses or individual financial products? Haven’t the rating agencies done an awful job to date? Are the folks with the green eyeshades who are crunching the numbers and giving their seal of approval so corrupted by the profit motive or fearful of political retaliation that they can’t “do the math” objectively?
In short, there are two reasons: First, we need some type of financial yardstick to compare countries, companies and bonds. There really are no guarantees associated with a rating of “AAA,” for example. It’s just a relative measure and only useful when compared to something with a “B+,” for example. Secondly, a rating gives us the assurance that someone who is somewhat objective with some kind of sophisticated financial education has looked at all the footnotes and read all the fine print… because G-d knows nobody else has (sometimes not even the salespeople). Of course, recent events have dramatically shown that the current system has failed. Unfortunately, it’s the only system we have.
So let’s take a look what the ratings of life insurance companies really mean. Given the hundreds of life insurance companies offering policies in the U.S. it can be a challenge to compare their relative financial strengths and ability to pay claims. The top rating agencies review in detail the accounting statements of publicly traded companies as well as private or mutual life insurance companies. Based on their reviews and further research into competitive intelligence and other sources, they will give an opinion on the credit-worthiness of the life insurance company and assign letter grades to each company and its subsidiaries. Furthermore, agencies will often note what direction they think future rating will head in their “outlook” for the company or industry.
Keep in mind that while the core attribute the rating agencies look at is “financial strength,” they also take into account how well the company operates as a business, the size of their market share, exposure to other businesses (such as investment management advice or property & casualty lines) and overall business mix. For example, every year, S&P positively noted New York Life “outstanding field sales force” as a competitive advantage.
How to Compare Life Insurance Company Ratings From Different Agencies
I’m a big fan of the old adage, “Life is too short to drink bad wine.” With the hundreds of available life insurance companies out there, does it make sense to go with a middle-tier company when there are already so many top-notch ones? Similarly, with all the five star mutual funds rated by Morningstar, why would you invest in a three star fund? A life insurance company’s rating is effectively a guide to its underlying financial strength and its ability to pay its claims when the time comes for you to collect the death benefit.
Keep in mind that many companies have subsidiaries that have similar sounding names (often due to state regulations or their own business strategies). When researching your specific company make sure that you are looking at the actual company that is underwriting the life insurance contract. For example, “MetLife” may actually be “MetLife Investors” if it is the 30-year term plan in New York. Your agent should be able to give you the exact company name. Your state insurance commission will have regular filings from each company that sells life insurance it that state.
Each rating agency uses its own proprietary methodology and mathematical model to assess the strength of the insurance companies they review. They look at factors such as the quality of the insurer’s assets and reserves; their source(s) of funding; profitability based on a review of public financial records and filings; market share in different product categories; management talent; and competitive market analysis compared to other insurers.
Here’s how the various rating agency “grades” match up:
(*) Numerical Grade conversions courtesy of The New York Times
(#) Comdex ranks insurance companies based on what other rating agencies have given them. The companies are then graded on a percentile system with only the top five companies in the 100th percentile, and others falling into the scale below that. The placement of the numerical rankings in the chart is my approximation.
Links to Rating Agencies
AM Best
Fitch
Moody’s
Standard & Poor's
Weiss
Comdex Score
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
Triple A, Gone Away
Well, it’s official: The United States Government no longer has a perfect credit score. On August 5, 2011 its credit rating was lowered by Standard & Poor’s to AA+ from AAA. The rating on the debt of the federal government and some specific agencies such as mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was lowered because S&P deemed it more risky due to the ballooning federal debt and the inability of the political process to reform entitlement programs.
In theory the four top rating agencies – Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, A.M. Best and Fitch’s – are the arbiters of the Country’s credit score. Despite all the sound and fury from the politicians in Washington, there are some real-life implications for people on Main Street. The lowering by S&P by one notch effectively brings the country’s FICO score down to something like 775 from 800.
It’s not that dramatic since only one of the top four rating agencies took such a drastic approach (the others said the Government’s problems are long-term and would not immediately affect their ratings). I’d like to note that some smaller agencies had already taken the politically unpalatable step of lowering the country’s rating. Let’s also keep in mind that S&P has been under serious political pressure to “get real” about its rating since it did such a pathetic job of rating all of those toxic mortgage-backed securities (see “The Big Short”).
Given all of the political pressure from Congress regarding the mortgage securities fiasco of the last three years, it’s ironic that they should come to downgrade the U.S. Government’s rating. Expect to see “show trials” (i.e., Congressional hearings) in Washington demonizing the rating agencies. Again, it’s ironic since the U.S. has been less than reliable when accounting for future liabilities such as Social Security and Medicare.
But, again, let’s put politics aside and investigate the “real life” implications of the aforementioned “downgrade:”
Insurance Company Ratings: What Do They Mean?
In tandem with the downgrade of the Government’s credit rating, S&P also lowered the AAA rating of a handful of the most stellar insurance companies. They also put the rest of the insurance industry on a “Negative” outlook (downgraded from “Stable”), mainly because of the heavy exposure they all have to U.S. securities in their reserve portfolios.
Companies downgraded to AA+ (Negative Outlook) from AAA (Stable Outlook):
New York Life
Northwestern Mutual
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association (TIAA-CREF)
Knights of Columbus
United Services Automobile Association (USAA)
Companies rated AA+ with “Stable Outlook” reduced to “Negative Outlook:”
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
Assured Guaranty Corp.
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc.
Does this mean that your life insurance company is about to go bankrupt ? Most likely, not. What it does mean is that S&P has decided that insurance companies that invest heavily in one country’s bonds can not have a higher credit rating than the actual bonds that they hold. So, in lockstep, if the U.S. rating goes down, so must the companies that hold a lot of U.S. debt. Needless to say, the affected insurance companies say they are unfairly being hit due to Washington’s political gridlock and that they still merit AAA ratings.
Going forward, the insurance companies will bolster their overall credit ratings by selling off their lower quality assets and buying higher quality ones. This may effectively improve their balance sheets over the long term and even increase their exposure to U.S. debt instruments. S&P maintained AAA ratings on many municipal bonds, so there still are high-quality assets for the insurance companies to put into their reserves. The reason the top handful of companies actually had the best ratings is that often they are better judges of quality than even the rating agencies.
The lowering of the U.S.’ credit rating, in the immediate term, has not led to a sell-off in U.S. Treasury assets. But indeed, we have seen a “flight to quality” as many investors see the U.S. Treasury Bonds as the “cleanest shirt in a hamper full of dirty shirts.” (I believe I can credit economics guru Nouriel Roubini for this analogy on Bloomberg Radio). In effect, U.S. assets at AA+ are still better quality than many European bonds.
Ultimately, the jury is still on whether interest rates on mortgages and credit cards will spike up. Longer term interest rates will be affected more by the strength or weakness of the overall economy and the amount of stimulus provided by the Federal Reserve and Congressional budget committees.
Why Ratings Still Matter
So why do we even care about ratings attributed to countries or businesses or individual financial products? Haven’t the rating agencies done an awful job to date? Are the folks with the green eyeshades who are crunching the numbers and giving their seal of approval so corrupted by the profit motive or fearful of political retaliation that they can’t “do the math” objectively?
In short, there are two reasons: First, we need some type of financial yardstick to compare countries, companies and bonds. There really are no guarantees associated with a rating of “AAA,” for example. It’s just a relative measure and only useful when compared to something with a “B+,” for example. Secondly, a rating gives us the assurance that someone who is somewhat objective with some kind of sophisticated financial education has looked at all the footnotes and read all the fine print… because G-d knows nobody else has (sometimes not even the salespeople). Of course, recent events have dramatically shown that the current system has failed. Unfortunately, it’s the only system we have.
So let’s take a look what the ratings of life insurance companies really mean. Given the hundreds of life insurance companies offering policies in the U.S. it can be a challenge to compare their relative financial strengths and ability to pay claims. The top rating agencies review in detail the accounting statements of publicly traded companies as well as private or mutual life insurance companies. Based on their reviews and further research into competitive intelligence and other sources, they will give an opinion on the credit-worthiness of the life insurance company and assign letter grades to each company and its subsidiaries. Furthermore, agencies will often note what direction they think future rating will head in their “outlook” for the company or industry.
Keep in mind that while the core attribute the rating agencies look at is “financial strength,” they also take into account how well the company operates as a business, the size of their market share, exposure to other businesses (such as investment management advice or property & casualty lines) and overall business mix. For example, every year, S&P positively noted New York Life “outstanding field sales force” as a competitive advantage.
How to Compare Life Insurance Company Ratings From Different Agencies
I’m a big fan of the old adage, “Life is too short to drink bad wine.” With the hundreds of available life insurance companies out there, does it make sense to go with a middle-tier company when there are already so many top-notch ones? Similarly, with all the five star mutual funds rated by Morningstar, why would you invest in a three star fund? A life insurance company’s rating is effectively a guide to its underlying financial strength and its ability to pay its claims when the time comes for you to collect the death benefit.
Keep in mind that many companies have subsidiaries that have similar sounding names (often due to state regulations or their own business strategies). When researching your specific company make sure that you are looking at the actual company that is underwriting the life insurance contract. For example, “MetLife” may actually be “MetLife Investors” if it is the 30-year term plan in New York. Your agent should be able to give you the exact company name. Your state insurance commission will have regular filings from each company that sells life insurance it that state.
Each rating agency uses its own proprietary methodology and mathematical model to assess the strength of the insurance companies they review. They look at factors such as the quality of the insurer’s assets and reserves; their source(s) of funding; profitability based on a review of public financial records and filings; market share in different product categories; management talent; and competitive market analysis compared to other insurers.
Here’s how the various rating agency “grades” match up:
Rank | A. M. Best | Standard & Poor's | Moody's | Fitch | Numerical Grade (*) | Comdex Score (#) |
1 | A++ | AAA | Aaa | AAA | 9.0 | 100 |
2 | A+ | AA+ | Aa1 | AA+ | 8.3 | |
3 | A | AA | Aa2 | AA | 8.0 | 90 |
4 | A- | AA- | Aa3 | AA- | 7.7 | |
5 | B++ | A+ | A1 | A+ | 7.3 | |
6 | B+ | A | A2 | A | 7.0 | 80 |
7 | B | A- | A3 | A- | 6.7 | |
8 | B- | BBB+ | Baa1 | BBB+ | 6.3 | 70 |
9 | C++ | BBB | Baa2 | BBB | 6.0 | |
10 | C+ | BBB- | Baa3 | BBB- | 5.7 | |
11 | C | BB+ | Ba1 | BB+ | 5.3 | |
12 | C- | BB | Ba2 | BB | 5.0 | 40 |
13 | D | BB- | Ba3 | BB- | 4.7 | |
14 | E | B+ | B1 | B+ | 4.3 | 20 |
15 | F | B | B2 | B | 4.0 | |
16 | S | B- | B3 | B- | 3.7 | |
17 | CCC+ | Caa1 | CCC+ | 3.3 | ||
18 | CCC | Caa2 | CCC | 3.0 | ||
19 | CCC- | Caa3 | CCC- | 2.7 | ||
20 | CC | Ca | CC | 2.0 | ||
21 |
| R | C | C |
(*) Numerical Grade conversions courtesy of The New York Times
(#) Comdex ranks insurance companies based on what other rating agencies have given them. The companies are then graded on a percentile system with only the top five companies in the 100th percentile, and others falling into the scale below that. The placement of the numerical rankings in the chart is my approximation.
Links to Rating Agencies
AM Best
Fitch
Moody’s
Standard & Poor's
Weiss
Comdex Score
Three Simple Steps to Avoid Probate
Tricks of the Trade: Three Simple Steps to Avoid Probate
by Richard F. O'Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
Much is said about the value of avoiding probate, the legal process where your will (if you have one) is validated and its provisions carried out. Complicated estates can be tied up for years with legal maneuvering and family wrangling. Most cases are straight-forward and uncomplicated – but they can still be time-consuming and emotionally draining.
First, you can free up some resources for your heirs by carefully naming them as beneficiaries on savings and checking accounts, adding them to the title of a car or boat, or including them on the deed of a piece of real estate. Designating some assets as “payable on death,” “transfer on death” or “in trust for” can accelerate the transfer of these assets to your intended beneficiaries. They just need to show copies of their identification and your death certificate to the bank or motor vehicles department.
If you are concerned that your heirs will have trouble paying taxes or expenses immediately after your death, carefully take stock of your smaller assets. This is particularly helpful for people who do not have a will or are not legally married to their spouses. You can free up these resources for them while the estate works itself through the probate process.
Second, most of your big assets such as your house, life insurance, pension, retirement plan or investment account should already have named beneficiaries or joint owners, which means they pass to the intended person (or trust) immediately upon death and avoid probate. Make copies of the signed and dated beneficiary designation forms and keep them in a safe place with your other financial records. Banks and insurance companies are not infallible – they lose these documents all the time! Make sure that you name contingent beneficiaries and tertiary beneficiaries. The last thing you want is for these important assets to wind up in your estate. They will be subject to death taxes, the vagaries of the probate process and (in the case of IRAs) immediate taxation.
Finally – but most importantly – make sure that you have a will. While this doesn’t “avoid” probate, it simplifies the process dramatically. If you have minor children, an unmarried spouse or even remotely complicated family affairs, at a minimum you should have a simple will. Attorneys can prepare a simple will for a few hundred dollars or you can use a software product or online service for a fraction of that cost. If you don’t already have a will, or it hasn’t been updated since you have had major changes in your life, make it a point to get one signed before the end of the year.
by Richard F. O'Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
Much is said about the value of avoiding probate, the legal process where your will (if you have one) is validated and its provisions carried out. Complicated estates can be tied up for years with legal maneuvering and family wrangling. Most cases are straight-forward and uncomplicated – but they can still be time-consuming and emotionally draining.
First, you can free up some resources for your heirs by carefully naming them as beneficiaries on savings and checking accounts, adding them to the title of a car or boat, or including them on the deed of a piece of real estate. Designating some assets as “payable on death,” “transfer on death” or “in trust for” can accelerate the transfer of these assets to your intended beneficiaries. They just need to show copies of their identification and your death certificate to the bank or motor vehicles department.
If you are concerned that your heirs will have trouble paying taxes or expenses immediately after your death, carefully take stock of your smaller assets. This is particularly helpful for people who do not have a will or are not legally married to their spouses. You can free up these resources for them while the estate works itself through the probate process.
Second, most of your big assets such as your house, life insurance, pension, retirement plan or investment account should already have named beneficiaries or joint owners, which means they pass to the intended person (or trust) immediately upon death and avoid probate. Make copies of the signed and dated beneficiary designation forms and keep them in a safe place with your other financial records. Banks and insurance companies are not infallible – they lose these documents all the time! Make sure that you name contingent beneficiaries and tertiary beneficiaries. The last thing you want is for these important assets to wind up in your estate. They will be subject to death taxes, the vagaries of the probate process and (in the case of IRAs) immediate taxation.
Finally – but most importantly – make sure that you have a will. While this doesn’t “avoid” probate, it simplifies the process dramatically. If you have minor children, an unmarried spouse or even remotely complicated family affairs, at a minimum you should have a simple will. Attorneys can prepare a simple will for a few hundred dollars or you can use a software product or online service for a fraction of that cost. If you don’t already have a will, or it hasn’t been updated since you have had major changes in your life, make it a point to get one signed before the end of the year.
Friday, 26 August 2011
Book Review: “Buckets of Money: How to Retire in Comfort and Safety”
“Buckets of Money: How to Retire in Comfort and Safety,” by Raymond J. Lucia, CFP (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004)
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
“The Insider’s Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning”
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
We’re taught to save throughout our working years to fund our retirement – diligently socking money into our 401(k)s and paying down our debt. But once we flip the switch and settle into a presumably worry-free retirement, how do we effectively and efficiently spend down our assets in those golden years? Ray Lucia, a Certified Financial Planner with a celebrity’s flair, helps us to answer this tough question with his “buckets of money” planning strategy.
The gist of “Buckets of Money” is that our nest eggs should be separated into three “buckets” of ultra-safe income streams, conservative medium-term assets and aggressive stock funds. Over seven-year cycles, the funds are depleted and shifted into the next immediate bucket to be used for current income. The buckets strategy leaps the key retirement planning hurdle by providing safety, growth, diversification, tax-efficiency and lifetime income. The book identifies which investments are appropriate for which buckets, along with guidelines for the proportions of each.
The book reads like a infomercial, but don’t let that turn you off. The general discussion of asset classes and products (stocks, bonds, annuities, etc.) is valuable for the novice and experienced investor alike. His comprehensive perspective honestly allows him to cover all potential investment classes. Mr. Lucia isn’t trying to sell you on anything other than his planning strategy (and he does that well).
Mr. Lucia’s website contains some notes on changes, but I’d like to see a fully updated edition of the book. For example, the buckets strategy recommends real estate holdings of as much as 20% of a portfolio in the form of real estate investment trusts. Given the 2008 mortgage meltdown, perhaps that should be reconsidered. Mr. Lucia only skims past the important backstop that life, disability and long-term care insurance provide as we switch our retirement portfolio from accumulation mode to distribution mode. Fortunately, the author takes into account the complexities of the tax code since intelligent tax planning can make or break a retirement plan. The book’s numerous statistical examples remain useful today.
The worksheets included in the book are quite easy to use. While the potential to “do it yourself” is there for the experienced investor who has a trusted advisor, I wouldn’t recommend that an individual adjust her portfolio without consulting a professional. I’m not sure if the buckets strategy is an “all or nothing” approach to investing. Any retirement plan can benefit from the non-controversial concepts presented here.
by Richard F. O’Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
“The Insider’s Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning”
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
We’re taught to save throughout our working years to fund our retirement – diligently socking money into our 401(k)s and paying down our debt. But once we flip the switch and settle into a presumably worry-free retirement, how do we effectively and efficiently spend down our assets in those golden years? Ray Lucia, a Certified Financial Planner with a celebrity’s flair, helps us to answer this tough question with his “buckets of money” planning strategy.
The gist of “Buckets of Money” is that our nest eggs should be separated into three “buckets” of ultra-safe income streams, conservative medium-term assets and aggressive stock funds. Over seven-year cycles, the funds are depleted and shifted into the next immediate bucket to be used for current income. The buckets strategy leaps the key retirement planning hurdle by providing safety, growth, diversification, tax-efficiency and lifetime income. The book identifies which investments are appropriate for which buckets, along with guidelines for the proportions of each.
The book reads like a infomercial, but don’t let that turn you off. The general discussion of asset classes and products (stocks, bonds, annuities, etc.) is valuable for the novice and experienced investor alike. His comprehensive perspective honestly allows him to cover all potential investment classes. Mr. Lucia isn’t trying to sell you on anything other than his planning strategy (and he does that well).
Mr. Lucia’s website contains some notes on changes, but I’d like to see a fully updated edition of the book. For example, the buckets strategy recommends real estate holdings of as much as 20% of a portfolio in the form of real estate investment trusts. Given the 2008 mortgage meltdown, perhaps that should be reconsidered. Mr. Lucia only skims past the important backstop that life, disability and long-term care insurance provide as we switch our retirement portfolio from accumulation mode to distribution mode. Fortunately, the author takes into account the complexities of the tax code since intelligent tax planning can make or break a retirement plan. The book’s numerous statistical examples remain useful today.
The worksheets included in the book are quite easy to use. While the potential to “do it yourself” is there for the experienced investor who has a trusted advisor, I wouldn’t recommend that an individual adjust her portfolio without consulting a professional. I’m not sure if the buckets strategy is an “all or nothing” approach to investing. Any retirement plan can benefit from the non-controversial concepts presented here.
Book Review: “The Complete Guide to Reverse Mortgages,” by Tammy Kramer and Tyler Kraemer
“The Complete Guide to Reverse Mortgages,” by Tammy Kramer and Tyler Kraemer (Adams Media, 2007)
by Richard F. O'Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
"The Insider's Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning"
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
Tammy and Tyler Kraemer do professional advisors and consumers a valuable service by demystifying reverse mortgages. The sale of reverse mortgages has boomed in the past 20 years as house-rich/cash-poor retirees seek to tap into their home equity to fund their golden years. “The Complete Guide to Reverse Mortgages” details and explains the many benefits and pitfalls of these complex and poorly understood financial products. Every professional advisor should read this book, along with every consumer seriously considering one.
Over the last three or four years I have seen a surge in published articles (good and bad) on reverse mortgages. This is mainly because our retirement investments have failed to produce the expected pile of money to live off of. Up until 2008 (the year after this book was published) our home values had increased beyond rationally expected levels. The perfect storm of crashing investment accounts, crimped budgets and plummeting home equity values makes the consideration of a reverse mortgage even more pertinent.
“The Complete Guide to Reverse Mortgages” is a consumer-friendly volume with useful worksheets and illustrations. If you are a senior considering a reverse mortgage (or adult child of one), take 30 minutes to pencil through the worksheets. Better yet, sit down with a financial advisor or mortgage specialist and do them together. Don’t hesitate to float the idea past intelligent friends, your family attorney or a neighborhood insurance agent. The consumer is well-advised to carefully network to find a reputable reverse mortgage specialist. You may bring any financial advisor along with you to a consultation. By speaking with a variety of advisors, you will be sure to explore the fullest spectrum of options. This is a financial purchase you should be extremely cautious about because it’s a long-term commitment.
Many things have changed in the reverse mortgage market since the 2008 financial meltdown so on February 25, 2011, I spoke with Jim Calimopulos, Reverse Mortgage Sales Manager at Worldwide Capital Mortgage Corp. in Bay Shore, NY.
Mortgage rates and the costs of reverse mortgages in general have increased, and property values have decreased, which means that less money is ultimately put into a consumer’s pocket when they take out a reverse mortgage. The highly publicized failure of IndyMac bank (one of the largest reverse mortgage providers) has fortunately not made a great impact on the availability of these products to consumers since other companies such as Financial Freedom and MetLife continue to be strong players.
Since 2010, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program has sought to lower some costs and provide more options to consumers. As Mr. Calimopulos explained, if a couple is downsizing their home and moving into a new home, they can greatly benefit from the HECM program. For example, if they sell their home for $300,000 and then buy a $250,000 home in a 55+ community, they can still get a reverse mortgage for up to $190,000 on the new property. Ultimately, the couple will have about $110,000 in cash to put aside for use in the coming years.
by Richard F. O'Boyle, Jr., LUTCF, MBA
"The Insider's Guide to Retirement and Insurance Planning"
http://www.retirementandinsurance.com
Tammy and Tyler Kraemer do professional advisors and consumers a valuable service by demystifying reverse mortgages. The sale of reverse mortgages has boomed in the past 20 years as house-rich/cash-poor retirees seek to tap into their home equity to fund their golden years. “The Complete Guide to Reverse Mortgages” details and explains the many benefits and pitfalls of these complex and poorly understood financial products. Every professional advisor should read this book, along with every consumer seriously considering one.
Over the last three or four years I have seen a surge in published articles (good and bad) on reverse mortgages. This is mainly because our retirement investments have failed to produce the expected pile of money to live off of. Up until 2008 (the year after this book was published) our home values had increased beyond rationally expected levels. The perfect storm of crashing investment accounts, crimped budgets and plummeting home equity values makes the consideration of a reverse mortgage even more pertinent.
“The Complete Guide to Reverse Mortgages” is a consumer-friendly volume with useful worksheets and illustrations. If you are a senior considering a reverse mortgage (or adult child of one), take 30 minutes to pencil through the worksheets. Better yet, sit down with a financial advisor or mortgage specialist and do them together. Don’t hesitate to float the idea past intelligent friends, your family attorney or a neighborhood insurance agent. The consumer is well-advised to carefully network to find a reputable reverse mortgage specialist. You may bring any financial advisor along with you to a consultation. By speaking with a variety of advisors, you will be sure to explore the fullest spectrum of options. This is a financial purchase you should be extremely cautious about because it’s a long-term commitment.
Many things have changed in the reverse mortgage market since the 2008 financial meltdown so on February 25, 2011, I spoke with Jim Calimopulos, Reverse Mortgage Sales Manager at Worldwide Capital Mortgage Corp. in Bay Shore, NY.
Mortgage rates and the costs of reverse mortgages in general have increased, and property values have decreased, which means that less money is ultimately put into a consumer’s pocket when they take out a reverse mortgage. The highly publicized failure of IndyMac bank (one of the largest reverse mortgage providers) has fortunately not made a great impact on the availability of these products to consumers since other companies such as Financial Freedom and MetLife continue to be strong players.
Since 2010, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program has sought to lower some costs and provide more options to consumers. As Mr. Calimopulos explained, if a couple is downsizing their home and moving into a new home, they can greatly benefit from the HECM program. For example, if they sell their home for $300,000 and then buy a $250,000 home in a 55+ community, they can still get a reverse mortgage for up to $190,000 on the new property. Ultimately, the couple will have about $110,000 in cash to put aside for use in the coming years.
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Positive Changes For Diabetics In The UK Critical Illness Market
For a long time the provision of critical illness cover in the UK for diabetics has been extremely limited. Where critical illness cover has been available it has come with significant exclusions for cardio vascular risks, the very critical illnesses that would be of most interest to those with diabetes.
The good news is that significant changes are taking place which mean that for some diabetics we are now able to arrange critical illness cover without any exclusions. As specialists in the proctection market for people with health conditions welcome this excellent new development which we believe will be of real benefit to many diabetics. Diabetics wishing to make enquiries should visit http://www.moneysworth.co.uk/ or call 0845 430 5200
The good news is that significant changes are taking place which mean that for some diabetics we are now able to arrange critical illness cover without any exclusions. As specialists in the proctection market for people with health conditions welcome this excellent new development which we believe will be of real benefit to many diabetics. Diabetics wishing to make enquiries should visit http://www.moneysworth.co.uk/ or call 0845 430 5200
Monday, 16 May 2011
Breast Cancer - Positive News On Life Insurance and Critical Illness Cover
We wanted to share some good news.
We were recently approached by a lady who was looking for life insurance. Aged in her late 50's our client had suffered from breast cancer a number of years ago from which she had been in complete remission for a number of years. She also had one or two other conditions which while less significant would often with most insurance companies result in having to pay additional premiums.
The good news is that we were able to obtain life cover for this client at ordinary rates with no increase in premium to cover her previous serious health condition. The life cover includes full cover for death by whatever cause, including cancer(and including breast cancer) and the premiums are guaranteed not to increase in the future.
This is a great result!
The outcomes for life insurance applications from people who have suffered breast cancer in the past,l depend upon a number of factors.
Firstly the person must be in remission.
Secondly it is more common for there to be additional premiums charged to cover the extra perceived risk.
The amount of extra premium will typically depend on a number of different factors including the amount of time since the end of treatment (surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) and the original sizing and staging. Not every life insurance company will rate the same way and this is where it pays to use the services of a specialist broker such as Moneysworth. In the above case we were able to obtain £45,000 for less than £30pm.
It is also worth mentioning critical illness cover.
It is often assumed that critical illness cover is not available for anyone who has been previously diagnosed with breast cancer. However while this remains true for some cases it is no longer necessarily correct in all cases. For cases where the initial staging was low and where some time has passed since treatment finished, not only might it be possible to obtain critical illness cover, it may also be possible to do so at very competitive premium levels too. Any future episodes of breast cancer will be excluded from the list of critical illnesses covered, as will any other critical illness which is caused by the initial breast cancer, but apart from that the full range of other critical illnesses normally available will be included in the policy.
So, if you have had breast cancer in the past, your prospects for both life cover and critical illness cover could be brighter than you think.
We were recently approached by a lady who was looking for life insurance. Aged in her late 50's our client had suffered from breast cancer a number of years ago from which she had been in complete remission for a number of years. She also had one or two other conditions which while less significant would often with most insurance companies result in having to pay additional premiums.
The good news is that we were able to obtain life cover for this client at ordinary rates with no increase in premium to cover her previous serious health condition. The life cover includes full cover for death by whatever cause, including cancer(and including breast cancer) and the premiums are guaranteed not to increase in the future.
This is a great result!
The outcomes for life insurance applications from people who have suffered breast cancer in the past,l depend upon a number of factors.
Firstly the person must be in remission.
Secondly it is more common for there to be additional premiums charged to cover the extra perceived risk.
The amount of extra premium will typically depend on a number of different factors including the amount of time since the end of treatment (surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) and the original sizing and staging. Not every life insurance company will rate the same way and this is where it pays to use the services of a specialist broker such as Moneysworth. In the above case we were able to obtain £45,000 for less than £30pm.
It is also worth mentioning critical illness cover.
It is often assumed that critical illness cover is not available for anyone who has been previously diagnosed with breast cancer. However while this remains true for some cases it is no longer necessarily correct in all cases. For cases where the initial staging was low and where some time has passed since treatment finished, not only might it be possible to obtain critical illness cover, it may also be possible to do so at very competitive premium levels too. Any future episodes of breast cancer will be excluded from the list of critical illnesses covered, as will any other critical illness which is caused by the initial breast cancer, but apart from that the full range of other critical illnesses normally available will be included in the policy.
So, if you have had breast cancer in the past, your prospects for both life cover and critical illness cover could be brighter than you think.
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
How long after a heart attack before I can apply for life insurance?
How soon can someone apply for life insurance after suffering a heart attack?
This is a question we are often asked as we receive an increasing amount of enquiries from people who have suffered a heart attack (myocardial infarction). For those affected it is not surprising that their minds should turn to this subject. For having survived a heart attack we are normally given a little while to recover and for many this provides time to consider what the future might hold, especially for our familes and those who financially depend upon us.
For some it can be worrying to realise that they have insufficient life cover to repay the outstanding balance on the mortgage. This means that in the event of their death, amidst and that that would mean to their nearest and dearest, the family home may be at risk as well!
The mind then turns to questions about how difficult it might be to obtain life insurance following a heart attack and how long it might take to arrange for cover to be in place..............
Well generally speaking the prospects are often better than might at first be assumed.
Firstly if you were over the age of 40 at the time of your heart attack and you have only had one heart attack there is a good chance that you will be able to obtain life insurance. However if your heart attack was severe or if you have further health conditions (eg diabetes) then you may find it difficult to obtain life cover.
Just how long it will take to obtain life cover after your heart attack will vary from one insurance company to another. Generally speaking most life insurance companies will be prepared to offer you cover twelve months after the heart attack and some will even consider offering terms six months.
It may even be possible to do even better than that! We know one or two life companies who may consider applications one month after the client suffering a heart attack, depending on the overall picture.
So if you, or someone you know, has recently suffered a heart attack, if you are worried that you have insufficient life cover in place to sufficiently protect your family, if you think its probably too late to get life cover......... don't despair. It might be easier to get life cover than you think.
This is a question we are often asked as we receive an increasing amount of enquiries from people who have suffered a heart attack (myocardial infarction). For those affected it is not surprising that their minds should turn to this subject. For having survived a heart attack we are normally given a little while to recover and for many this provides time to consider what the future might hold, especially for our familes and those who financially depend upon us.
For some it can be worrying to realise that they have insufficient life cover to repay the outstanding balance on the mortgage. This means that in the event of their death, amidst and that that would mean to their nearest and dearest, the family home may be at risk as well!
The mind then turns to questions about how difficult it might be to obtain life insurance following a heart attack and how long it might take to arrange for cover to be in place..............
Well generally speaking the prospects are often better than might at first be assumed.
Firstly if you were over the age of 40 at the time of your heart attack and you have only had one heart attack there is a good chance that you will be able to obtain life insurance. However if your heart attack was severe or if you have further health conditions (eg diabetes) then you may find it difficult to obtain life cover.
Just how long it will take to obtain life cover after your heart attack will vary from one insurance company to another. Generally speaking most life insurance companies will be prepared to offer you cover twelve months after the heart attack and some will even consider offering terms six months.
It may even be possible to do even better than that! We know one or two life companies who may consider applications one month after the client suffering a heart attack, depending on the overall picture.
So if you, or someone you know, has recently suffered a heart attack, if you are worried that you have insufficient life cover in place to sufficiently protect your family, if you think its probably too late to get life cover......... don't despair. It might be easier to get life cover than you think.
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
Diabetes, Smoking and Life (Insurance)
'There's nothing worse than an ex-smoker' it's said so I'll start by fessing up to a previous habit. My purpose is not to moralise on the subject (we all make our own choices anyway), I simply want to look at how insurance companies currently view smoking and diabetes. Also just before I get going I should point out that we at Moneysworth help both smoking and non smoking diabetics to obtain life cover, day in day out.
It may seem a bit obvious but we and the life companies all know, as it says on our the packets, that smoking is bad for our health. As mentioned in previous blogs not only do life companies charge significantly higher premiums for smoking, the price differential has been increasing over the years too.
So what about diabetes and smoking? Well did you know that some life companies not only charge extra for both being diabetic and for smoking but also make a further third charge for smoking AND having diabetes? We also know of one major insurance company who automatically decline all type 1 diabetic smokers, regardless of how good the rest of their profile.
So why the nervousness? It's all to do with cardio vascular risks. Diabetics are at increased risk of cardio vascular events and of course unfortunately diabetes is a progessive illness. Doctors are therefore keen to identify and manage key cardio vascular risk factors in their diabetic patients. Key factors include BMI and a family history of early diagnosis of heart conditions. Many diabetics take statins and in a significant amount of cases this is not due to the patient having a cholesterol problem, but to make sure that they don't develop one in the future, as this would again provide an additional cardio vascular risk. Blood pressure is another key factor.
Perhaps to some readers the risk of cardio vascular complications for the diabetic does not seem too important or immediate. I would urge such readers to think again. Firstly and most obviously a lot of people do die of heart attacks - and for these the warning signs often come too late ornot at all. Secondly for those diabetics who do manage to survive a heart attack or who are diagnosed with angina for example, the chances of obtaining new life cover currently reduce to nil with all the major UK life companies. I will return to this issue in a later blog.
In the meantime what can smoking diabetics expect when applying for life cover? The truth is that many of them can expect to be declined by a lot of companies. You will save yourself a lot of time and heartache if you use the services of a broker who really specialises in health conditions.
The significance of smoking for Type 2 sufferers who apply for life cover will depend upon the number and seriousness of other additional (especially cardio vascular) risk factors present as well as the level of smoking. At the very least the premiums will be significantly more expensive and at worst the applicant might struggle to get any life cover at all.
For Type 1 sufferers smoking is even worse and applications are even more likely to end in declinature. The reason why is as follows. Type 1 sufferers tend to have already been living with diabetes for a lot longer than the average Type 2 sufferer who is seeking life cover. This means that they generally start at higher rating bands to begin with. This also means that there is less room for the insurance companies to play with in terms of adding extra amounts of ratings for extra complications, before the cases turn into a 'decline'. It is still possible for some type 1 diabetic smokers to obtain life cover but its more difficult than for type 2 diabetics.
The news for diabetics who are able to give up smoking for at least 12 months is generally more positive as they can still be treated as non smokers by the life companies. Stopping smoking is likely to result in a more favourable attidue from life companies and cheaper premiums.
So in summary our advice for smoking diabetics is
1) Do seriously consider giving up smoking if at all possible, most importantly it will improve your health in the long term and save you a lot of money.
2) When you give up smoking for 12 months do expect life assurance companies to seek to verify this by way of a cotinine test.
3) Don't however delay purchasing life cover in the meantime. Waiting until you have stopped smoking for 12 months before applying for life cover may leave your family with little or no protection and the prospect of losing the family home. Its better to find cover now and protect your family even if you apply for a lesser am,ount of cover than you would ideally like. Most people will still stand a good chance of benefitting from reduced premiums when you have stopped smoking for 12 months anyway.
4) Use a specialist broker rather than trying to arrnage the life cover yourself - its quicker and you are likely to get a better result. But make sure the broker really is specialist in arranging life cover for diabetics first.
5) If you think it is unlikely that you will choose to stop smoking in the foreseeable future, then work on the basis that it will become more difficult and more expensive to obtain life cover in the future. Get covered now and keep hold of it!
It may seem a bit obvious but we and the life companies all know, as it says on our the packets, that smoking is bad for our health. As mentioned in previous blogs not only do life companies charge significantly higher premiums for smoking, the price differential has been increasing over the years too.
So what about diabetes and smoking? Well did you know that some life companies not only charge extra for both being diabetic and for smoking but also make a further third charge for smoking AND having diabetes? We also know of one major insurance company who automatically decline all type 1 diabetic smokers, regardless of how good the rest of their profile.
So why the nervousness? It's all to do with cardio vascular risks. Diabetics are at increased risk of cardio vascular events and of course unfortunately diabetes is a progessive illness. Doctors are therefore keen to identify and manage key cardio vascular risk factors in their diabetic patients. Key factors include BMI and a family history of early diagnosis of heart conditions. Many diabetics take statins and in a significant amount of cases this is not due to the patient having a cholesterol problem, but to make sure that they don't develop one in the future, as this would again provide an additional cardio vascular risk. Blood pressure is another key factor.
Perhaps to some readers the risk of cardio vascular complications for the diabetic does not seem too important or immediate. I would urge such readers to think again. Firstly and most obviously a lot of people do die of heart attacks - and for these the warning signs often come too late ornot at all. Secondly for those diabetics who do manage to survive a heart attack or who are diagnosed with angina for example, the chances of obtaining new life cover currently reduce to nil with all the major UK life companies. I will return to this issue in a later blog.
In the meantime what can smoking diabetics expect when applying for life cover? The truth is that many of them can expect to be declined by a lot of companies. You will save yourself a lot of time and heartache if you use the services of a broker who really specialises in health conditions.
The significance of smoking for Type 2 sufferers who apply for life cover will depend upon the number and seriousness of other additional (especially cardio vascular) risk factors present as well as the level of smoking. At the very least the premiums will be significantly more expensive and at worst the applicant might struggle to get any life cover at all.
For Type 1 sufferers smoking is even worse and applications are even more likely to end in declinature. The reason why is as follows. Type 1 sufferers tend to have already been living with diabetes for a lot longer than the average Type 2 sufferer who is seeking life cover. This means that they generally start at higher rating bands to begin with. This also means that there is less room for the insurance companies to play with in terms of adding extra amounts of ratings for extra complications, before the cases turn into a 'decline'. It is still possible for some type 1 diabetic smokers to obtain life cover but its more difficult than for type 2 diabetics.
The news for diabetics who are able to give up smoking for at least 12 months is generally more positive as they can still be treated as non smokers by the life companies. Stopping smoking is likely to result in a more favourable attidue from life companies and cheaper premiums.
So in summary our advice for smoking diabetics is
1) Do seriously consider giving up smoking if at all possible, most importantly it will improve your health in the long term and save you a lot of money.
2) When you give up smoking for 12 months do expect life assurance companies to seek to verify this by way of a cotinine test.
3) Don't however delay purchasing life cover in the meantime. Waiting until you have stopped smoking for 12 months before applying for life cover may leave your family with little or no protection and the prospect of losing the family home. Its better to find cover now and protect your family even if you apply for a lesser am,ount of cover than you would ideally like. Most people will still stand a good chance of benefitting from reduced premiums when you have stopped smoking for 12 months anyway.
4) Use a specialist broker rather than trying to arrnage the life cover yourself - its quicker and you are likely to get a better result. But make sure the broker really is specialist in arranging life cover for diabetics first.
5) If you think it is unlikely that you will choose to stop smoking in the foreseeable future, then work on the basis that it will become more difficult and more expensive to obtain life cover in the future. Get covered now and keep hold of it!
Monday, 18 April 2011
A Positive Outcome For A Difficult Life Insurance Case
A client recently came to us with a difficult case - subaortic stenosis.
At Moneysworth we do our best to help everyone who comes to us with a health condition to obtain life cover. We deal with a lot of heart related medical conditions, especially heart attacks, angina and heart by passes. However there are of course a number of other heart conditions, including subaortic stenosis.
Like so many who come to us this client was seeking life insurance to cover his mortgage so that the remaining mortgage debt would be cleared in the event of his death, thereby providing him and his family with peace of mind knowing that should the worst happen the family would still have thier home. In this case our client was therefore seeking approximately £150,000 life cover for a 25 year repayment mortgage.
So what made this case difficult? Unfortunately for him, our client was diagnosed in early childhood with his heart condition. Later on in his childhood our client had a surgical proceedure, which could be argued to have been mostly a success, though some some slight leakage was detected for a while after the operation. Over time the leakage appeared to stop and the client now lives a normal life.
We approached a number of insurance companies on behalf of our client who were generally reluctant to agree to provide life insurance. There were no other significant health conditions in this case and clearly most life companies remained nervous about the key underlying health condition - subaortic stenosis. Despite most life companies declining to offer the life insurance we persisted with our search. We know from experience that it does not always follow that every life company will view the same information in the same way and sometimes we have to pass by a number of closed doors before we find one that is open.
Which is exactly what happened in this case. We managed to find a life company who were willing to look at the case differently. After obtaining detailed medical information they were able to view the outcome of the operation more favourably. Whilst they wished to charge a small additional amount to reflect some additional risk, they did not regard the additional health risk factors to be significant enough to warrant declining our client's application.
So the hard work and patience payed off and in the end we were able to acheive a very positive outcome for our client. Not only were we able to find the total amount of cover that our client was seeking, but we were able to do so at a very attractive premium of less than £17pm.
What a great result!
At Moneysworth we do our best to help everyone who comes to us with a health condition to obtain life cover. We deal with a lot of heart related medical conditions, especially heart attacks, angina and heart by passes. However there are of course a number of other heart conditions, including subaortic stenosis.
Like so many who come to us this client was seeking life insurance to cover his mortgage so that the remaining mortgage debt would be cleared in the event of his death, thereby providing him and his family with peace of mind knowing that should the worst happen the family would still have thier home. In this case our client was therefore seeking approximately £150,000 life cover for a 25 year repayment mortgage.
So what made this case difficult? Unfortunately for him, our client was diagnosed in early childhood with his heart condition. Later on in his childhood our client had a surgical proceedure, which could be argued to have been mostly a success, though some some slight leakage was detected for a while after the operation. Over time the leakage appeared to stop and the client now lives a normal life.
We approached a number of insurance companies on behalf of our client who were generally reluctant to agree to provide life insurance. There were no other significant health conditions in this case and clearly most life companies remained nervous about the key underlying health condition - subaortic stenosis. Despite most life companies declining to offer the life insurance we persisted with our search. We know from experience that it does not always follow that every life company will view the same information in the same way and sometimes we have to pass by a number of closed doors before we find one that is open.
Which is exactly what happened in this case. We managed to find a life company who were willing to look at the case differently. After obtaining detailed medical information they were able to view the outcome of the operation more favourably. Whilst they wished to charge a small additional amount to reflect some additional risk, they did not regard the additional health risk factors to be significant enough to warrant declining our client's application.
So the hard work and patience payed off and in the end we were able to acheive a very positive outcome for our client. Not only were we able to find the total amount of cover that our client was seeking, but we were able to do so at a very attractive premium of less than £17pm.
What a great result!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)